Years ago, it was easy to enjoy my preferred way to watch Carolina football and basketball games from home.
As Woody Durham used to call it, I had my own "Turn Down The Sound Party."
All I had to do is turn down the sound on the TV and flip on the radio to listen to the Tar Heel Sports Network and there were no issues with one being ahead of the other.
Technology changed that in the last decade or so and has made it maddeningly difficult. TV signals now take longer to arrive than a radio signal.
When I was in Newport News, Va., I could get a stream of the broadcast on the Internet and use my DirecTV DVR to sync them. I used to be able to do the same thing here in the Triangle with a radio broadcast until DirecTV's latest DVR made it next to impossible: When you pause it and then press play, it kicks back about five seconds. It just wasn't working.
My dad discovered and gave me a product that has given me a perfect solution.
Using the SportSync AM/FM audio-delay radio, I can delay the broadcast up to 8 seconds. That has allowed me to listen to Jones Angell, Eric Montross and the THSN and has spared me the yelling antics of Dick Vitale.
I have the SR-101 model. The SR-202 model pictured is the only one that appears to be sold now and it goes for around $60. Pretty pricey. But if you really want to hear the call from your favorite team's radio network, it might just be worth it.
On Thursday night when many of you Carolina (and State fans, for that matter) are groaning about having to listen to Dick Vitale while watching the game, I'll be blissfully unaware of his rants.
Running Tar Heel
Opinions and perspectives on Carolina athletics, running, newspapers and more
Monday, January 23, 2012
Saturday, January 21, 2012
My morning runs are a lot more entertaining with Brad and Britt
Thanks to two daily running partners on the radio, my early-morning runs are a lot more entertaining.
Generally, I prefer listening to talk radio during my runs. When I lived in Newport News, Va., and usually ran around 9:30 a.m. or 10 a.m., The Dan Patrick Show gave me an excellent option and Colin Cowherd (The Herd on ESPN Radio) was interesting many times.
Our move back to the Triangle in May 2010 shifted my work schedule, dictated that runs would start a little after 6 a.m., and I soon found a big problem: The options I knew about weren't very good.
There was Mike and Mike in the Morning on WCMC-FM (99.9 The Fan) and Mark and Mike on WDNC-AM (620 The Bull.) Both can be entertaining at times if they hit a subject that interests me or if they are interviewing somebody knowledgeable or interesting. But, for the most part, I'm bored -- and in the case of Mike and Mike irritated -- with those shows.
Mark Thomas and Mike Maniscalco have decent ACC discussions at times and Maniscalco does generate informative discussions about the Carolina Hurricanes. But those are the exceptions.
Without hearing about them from anybody or any source, I started looking around the FM dial and stumbled on the Brad and Britt show on WZTK (FM Talk 101.1). My runs have been much more entertaining since then, although it can be a challenge to run while laughing.
When I first started listening to Brad Krantz and Britt Whitmire in 2010, I figured that they must be syndicated and was stunned that one radio station had them all to itself.
Their station has an interesting geographic base since it draws in listeners from the Triad and the Triangle, but that does mean hearing stories during news updates sometimes from Greensboro that I don't care about.
I love sports, but how much sports talk can you take, particularly when it often is inane and NFL heavy? Brad and Britt do talk sports at times, but they hit a wide range of topics. They can bring humor and insight to a variety of subjects.
I am a hopeless political junkie, and Brad and Britt know politics, bringing excellent analysis throughout the current presidential campaign and particularly the morning after each debate.
They'll hammer both sides of the political spectrum even though they obviously lean to the left and Britt is a Libertarian.
Britt does terrific impressions. The most common is of Dan Rather, which he does daily with "The Rather Report." He does excellent impressions of George W. Bush, Strom Thurmond and Rush Limbaugh (Lil' Rush), among others. Even Sarah Palin? You betcha!
I will flip around at the top of the 7 o'clock hour until the Rather Report. I'll also do that if there's a topic that doesn't interest me, or a commercial break or the Panthers Report (which thankfully is done for the season) is airing, but Mike and Mike are so irritating that I don't stay away from 101.1 very long.
From the start of each hour in which Mike Greenberg and Mike Golic inexplicably are asked to do SportsCenter updates (have these guys heard of the NHL?) to Greenberg declaring that they are "back and better than ever," they give me so many reasons to turn away.
Seemingly every person Greenberg interviews is "the best" and every hour is the best ever. Golic actually is more tolerable, but the NFL obsession is too much to take. When Greenberg starts an hour by telling you there will be plenty of NFL talk, it's like me declaring that I have no hair-parting options.
Mike and Mike do have excellent guests at times and when Jay Bilas or ESPN's many baseball analysts are on, that's radio I enjoy. Mark and Mike have decent guests, although most of the interviews seem to be taped the day before (and repeated from one hour to the next), but the questioning isn't as good as it is on Mike and Mike.
Another maddening part of Mike and Mike is that I don't think those guys are allowed to cough without it being sponsored. From every call being sponsored by a national sandwich chain to a sponsor for "what everybody's talking about," you would think it's a NASCAR race. That's thankfully not the case with Brad and Britt.
Don't get me started on the crazy songs they come up with for players and the completely stupid bit they do when picking NFL games. Maybe I'm just not the demographic they're targeting.
I also appreciate that Brad and Britt don't beat you over the head with teasers. Mike and Mike never go to a commercial without teasing you with some allegedly great information or tidbit they will give you when they come back. And "coming up next" could actually not happen for 15 minutes. Brad and Britt will tell you which guests they will welcome later in the show, but the way they do it isn't irritating at all.
On a regular basis, Brad and Britt bring on an impressive stable of ABC Radio reporters. My favorite is White House correspondent Ann Compton. They also welcome Sam Donaldson on a weekly basis, although he invariably doesn't come on until I'm at work. They have all sorts of national guests who make for compelling radio, and they aren't shy about asking tough questions.
I've listened to talk radio for years. Outside of the sports-radio realm, I remember listening to Larry Glick out of Boston, Perry Marshall out of Pittsburgh and Bob Lacey (Lacey Listens) out of Charlotte when I was a kid. All didn't have a political agenda and were entertaining. Such shows are really hard to find these days.
Brad and Britt belong on, if not at the top of, the list of the best radio talk shows I've heard. I'm glad they're part of my morning routine.
Generally, I prefer listening to talk radio during my runs. When I lived in Newport News, Va., and usually ran around 9:30 a.m. or 10 a.m., The Dan Patrick Show gave me an excellent option and Colin Cowherd (The Herd on ESPN Radio) was interesting many times.
Our move back to the Triangle in May 2010 shifted my work schedule, dictated that runs would start a little after 6 a.m., and I soon found a big problem: The options I knew about weren't very good.
There was Mike and Mike in the Morning on WCMC-FM (99.9 The Fan) and Mark and Mike on WDNC-AM (620 The Bull.) Both can be entertaining at times if they hit a subject that interests me or if they are interviewing somebody knowledgeable or interesting. But, for the most part, I'm bored -- and in the case of Mike and Mike irritated -- with those shows.
Mark Thomas and Mike Maniscalco have decent ACC discussions at times and Maniscalco does generate informative discussions about the Carolina Hurricanes. But those are the exceptions.
![]() |
| Brad Krantz and Britt Whitmire provide compelling and entertaining talk in the mornings for Triad and Triangle listeners. |
When I first started listening to Brad Krantz and Britt Whitmire in 2010, I figured that they must be syndicated and was stunned that one radio station had them all to itself.
Their station has an interesting geographic base since it draws in listeners from the Triad and the Triangle, but that does mean hearing stories during news updates sometimes from Greensboro that I don't care about.
I love sports, but how much sports talk can you take, particularly when it often is inane and NFL heavy? Brad and Britt do talk sports at times, but they hit a wide range of topics. They can bring humor and insight to a variety of subjects.
I am a hopeless political junkie, and Brad and Britt know politics, bringing excellent analysis throughout the current presidential campaign and particularly the morning after each debate.
They'll hammer both sides of the political spectrum even though they obviously lean to the left and Britt is a Libertarian.
Britt does terrific impressions. The most common is of Dan Rather, which he does daily with "The Rather Report." He does excellent impressions of George W. Bush, Strom Thurmond and Rush Limbaugh (Lil' Rush), among others. Even Sarah Palin? You betcha!
I will flip around at the top of the 7 o'clock hour until the Rather Report. I'll also do that if there's a topic that doesn't interest me, or a commercial break or the Panthers Report (which thankfully is done for the season) is airing, but Mike and Mike are so irritating that I don't stay away from 101.1 very long.
From the start of each hour in which Mike Greenberg and Mike Golic inexplicably are asked to do SportsCenter updates (have these guys heard of the NHL?) to Greenberg declaring that they are "back and better than ever," they give me so many reasons to turn away.
Seemingly every person Greenberg interviews is "the best" and every hour is the best ever. Golic actually is more tolerable, but the NFL obsession is too much to take. When Greenberg starts an hour by telling you there will be plenty of NFL talk, it's like me declaring that I have no hair-parting options.
Mike and Mike do have excellent guests at times and when Jay Bilas or ESPN's many baseball analysts are on, that's radio I enjoy. Mark and Mike have decent guests, although most of the interviews seem to be taped the day before (and repeated from one hour to the next), but the questioning isn't as good as it is on Mike and Mike.
Another maddening part of Mike and Mike is that I don't think those guys are allowed to cough without it being sponsored. From every call being sponsored by a national sandwich chain to a sponsor for "what everybody's talking about," you would think it's a NASCAR race. That's thankfully not the case with Brad and Britt.
Don't get me started on the crazy songs they come up with for players and the completely stupid bit they do when picking NFL games. Maybe I'm just not the demographic they're targeting.
I also appreciate that Brad and Britt don't beat you over the head with teasers. Mike and Mike never go to a commercial without teasing you with some allegedly great information or tidbit they will give you when they come back. And "coming up next" could actually not happen for 15 minutes. Brad and Britt will tell you which guests they will welcome later in the show, but the way they do it isn't irritating at all.
On a regular basis, Brad and Britt bring on an impressive stable of ABC Radio reporters. My favorite is White House correspondent Ann Compton. They also welcome Sam Donaldson on a weekly basis, although he invariably doesn't come on until I'm at work. They have all sorts of national guests who make for compelling radio, and they aren't shy about asking tough questions.
I've listened to talk radio for years. Outside of the sports-radio realm, I remember listening to Larry Glick out of Boston, Perry Marshall out of Pittsburgh and Bob Lacey (Lacey Listens) out of Charlotte when I was a kid. All didn't have a political agenda and were entertaining. Such shows are really hard to find these days.
Brad and Britt belong on, if not at the top of, the list of the best radio talk shows I've heard. I'm glad they're part of my morning routine.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Newspaper business just keeps getting more crazy
I got news about two of my former newspapers Thursday. Both surprised me, but I suppose neither should stun me.
Logic in the newspaper industry would probably stun me.
I learned from a blog post by Burlington Times-News Editor Madison Taylor that carriers for the Times-News have started delivering the Greensboro News & Record. It's not quite like Mike Krzyzewski sharing scouting reports with Roy Williams, but it's very hard to believe. (As an aside, I delivered the Greensboro Daily News during my senior year of high school in Chapel Hill.)
Why the two biggest papers in the Triangle, the Herald-Sun and the News & Observer, will go without on-site copy desks before something crazy like that happens. Wait. All of that has happened.
When I was at the Times-News, we battled the News & Record on a daily basis and hated when it scooped us on a story. It was more competition to us than we were for it, but the battle lines definitely were there.
I remember having to sign a non-compete agreement that wouldn't allow me to work for the competition for one year after I left the Times-News. The agreement was really only enforced if you wanted to go to the News & Record. I left the Times-News for the The Herald-Sun, and it was no problem.
Sadly, the other news was much less surprising. The Newport News Daily Press, which laid me off in March 2010 after I had survived 6 rounds of layoffs in 5 years, had yet another round of layoffs. This time it was 31 people, including three in the newsroom. It sounds like two of the newsroom people departing took buyouts, which turns a huge negative into a slight positive.
I have that unsettling feeling I've had many times before: Very sad for the friends who no longer have jobs but very happy for my friends who still have jobs.
The first I heard of the DP layoffs was from something called the James River Journal, which was new to me. It ran a poorly-written story that said said the DP would lay off 150 people "over the next few weeks." When I heard it was "only" 31, I was a little relieved. I question the accuracy of the story knowing that this week it was 31 and not 150. I do worry about the "over the next few weeks" part.
When I see all the bad publicity that Mitt Romney is getting because of the "vulture capitalist" activities that are alleged to have happened at Bain Capital when he worked there, I can't help but think of Sam Zell. What he set into motion at Tribune is not quite the same, but is no less sad.
Obviously, plenty of newspapers have been trimming staff for years. But what Zell did to Tribune newspapers sounds similar to Bain. He sold off Newsday and made decisions that have led to a massive amount of layoffs in the chain.
I don't know about the other Tribune newspapers, but the Daily Press was a thriving newspaper with many more writers, copy editors and photographers before Zell's people started carving it up. From what I understand, the DP was doing pretty well financially. There are still good people there, but the numbers are way down.
I'm happy for folks who still are working in newspapers, but I'm awfully glad I'm not one of them!
Logic in the newspaper industry would probably stun me.
I learned from a blog post by Burlington Times-News Editor Madison Taylor that carriers for the Times-News have started delivering the Greensboro News & Record. It's not quite like Mike Krzyzewski sharing scouting reports with Roy Williams, but it's very hard to believe. (As an aside, I delivered the Greensboro Daily News during my senior year of high school in Chapel Hill.)
Why the two biggest papers in the Triangle, the Herald-Sun and the News & Observer, will go without on-site copy desks before something crazy like that happens. Wait. All of that has happened.
When I was at the Times-News, we battled the News & Record on a daily basis and hated when it scooped us on a story. It was more competition to us than we were for it, but the battle lines definitely were there.
I remember having to sign a non-compete agreement that wouldn't allow me to work for the competition for one year after I left the Times-News. The agreement was really only enforced if you wanted to go to the News & Record. I left the Times-News for the The Herald-Sun, and it was no problem.
Sadly, the other news was much less surprising. The Newport News Daily Press, which laid me off in March 2010 after I had survived 6 rounds of layoffs in 5 years, had yet another round of layoffs. This time it was 31 people, including three in the newsroom. It sounds like two of the newsroom people departing took buyouts, which turns a huge negative into a slight positive.
I have that unsettling feeling I've had many times before: Very sad for the friends who no longer have jobs but very happy for my friends who still have jobs.
The first I heard of the DP layoffs was from something called the James River Journal, which was new to me. It ran a poorly-written story that said said the DP would lay off 150 people "over the next few weeks." When I heard it was "only" 31, I was a little relieved. I question the accuracy of the story knowing that this week it was 31 and not 150. I do worry about the "over the next few weeks" part.
When I see all the bad publicity that Mitt Romney is getting because of the "vulture capitalist" activities that are alleged to have happened at Bain Capital when he worked there, I can't help but think of Sam Zell. What he set into motion at Tribune is not quite the same, but is no less sad.
Obviously, plenty of newspapers have been trimming staff for years. But what Zell did to Tribune newspapers sounds similar to Bain. He sold off Newsday and made decisions that have led to a massive amount of layoffs in the chain.
I don't know about the other Tribune newspapers, but the Daily Press was a thriving newspaper with many more writers, copy editors and photographers before Zell's people started carving it up. From what I understand, the DP was doing pretty well financially. There are still good people there, but the numbers are way down.
I'm happy for folks who still are working in newspapers, but I'm awfully glad I'm not one of them!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

